Deposited But Not Delivered: India's Mountain of Unclaimed MACT Compensation
Nearly ₹1,000 crore in court-awarded crash compensation sits unclaimed across five High Court jurisdictions — a last-mile failure in delivering financial justice to families.

The scale of the problem
Motor Accident Claims Tribunals (MACTs) were designed as a fast-track remedy: insurers deposit court-awarded compensation; families withdraw it to rebuild their lives. In practice, an audit across five High Court jurisdictions reveals nearly ₹1,000 crore deposited but never disbursed. Every rupee belongs to a household that has already lost a breadwinner.
These figures cover only five High Court jurisdictions. The nationwide number is almost certainly much larger — but no one has counted yet.
Supreme Court directions
In April 2025, the Supreme Court took judicial notice of this systemic bottleneck in In Re: Compensation Amounts Deposited with Motor Accident Claims Tribunals and Labour Courts. The Court issued specific directions:
- National dashboardAn e-Courts dashboard listing deposits, claimants, case status and bank details, district-wise.
- Bank details on awardEvery claimant must furnish IFSC, account and a cancelled cheque at the time of order.
- FDR-protected fundsUndisbursed deposits must be invested in nationalised-bank FDRs and auto-renewed.
- Active tracingSLSAs, revenue and police officers must trace unclaimed beneficiaries and report in 4 months.
- Direct bank transferJudges must verify identity and route awards by RTGS/NEFT directly to the claimant's account.
A few states — Jharkhand, Bihar, Himachal Pradesh — already maintain dedicated MACT dashboards. Most do not.
Process after an award (MCTAP)
The Modified Claims Tribunal Agreed Procedure (MCTAP) — approved by the Delhi High Court — lays down a clear, time-bound execution chain. In principle, it should leave no room for unclaimed deposits:
- 30 days to depositInsurer transfers full compensation to the Tribunal via RTGS/NEFT within 30 days of the award.
- 15 days to intimateInsurer notifies claimant and files compliance; failure to do so can trigger bank-account attachment after 90 days.
- MACAD schemeFunds disbursed via the MACAD annuity scheme through ~21 designated public-sector banks for structured monthly payouts.
- FDR safeguardsIndividual claimant accounts only, original FDRs in safe custody, no cheque book / debit card, monthly interest via ECS, no premature break without court order.
- Form XVII & XVIIICompliance Report and Award Register maintained for audit and claimant verification.
Why awards go unclaimed
- Lost trackFamilies relocate, change phone numbers, and lose contact with their advocate.
- Procedural fogWithdrawal requires affidavits, identity proofs, and bench appearances most claimants cannot navigate.
- Advocate dependencyAwards routed through counsel sometimes never reach the named beneficiary.
- No outreachTribunals do not actively trace claimants once an award is passed.
What families experience
“The lawyer said the case was won. That was four years ago. I have never seen a rupee, and I no longer know which court to ask.”
Field interviews across UP, Bihar and Maharashtra found that most bereaved families did not know an award had been passed in their favour. Of those that did, the majority gave up after one or two failed visits.
Fixes the system needs
The road ahead
A standardised national MACT disbursal protocol — built once, deployed across states — would convert ₹1,000 crore of dormant compensation into real relief for families. The legal victory has already been won. What remains is delivery.
Money awarded must reach families
MACT awards are a constitutional remedy. They cannot remain a paper victory.
- Mandate digital, Aadhaar-linked award disbursal within 90 days
- Publish a public registry of pending claimants by tribunal
- Fund legal-aid helpdesks at every district MACT bench
Share this story
₹1,000 crore in crash compensation lies undisbursed. A research brief on India's MACT last-mile failure.